Arguments for and against the practice

Capital punishment is the death penalty. It is used today and was used in ancient times to punish a variety of offenses. Even the bible advocates death for murder and other crimes like kidnapping and witchcraft.

Arguments for and against the practice

Argument from False Achievement 7. Argument from the Children Argument from Danger o The substance or technology endangers the user to some significant degree.

Nicotine is a well-known stimulant and it is linked to cancer and other diseases, yet, few sport associations prohibit it. A prohibition appears to say that the athlete is in some manner unfit to make this decisions o Danger inherent in many sports to begin with: Argument from Unnaturalness o This is probably the weakest argument of all.

Arsenic is after all a naturally occurring substance while chocolate has to be manufactured. Argument from Objectification o A less common argument for banning PETS is that the use of PETs turns the athlete into an object, a tool for success instead of a human being. The athlete still needs natural ability as well as dedicated training and practice in order to see his ability improve.

Background on Dr Wood

Instead of wasting time washing dishes at the sink, one can spend the time writing his philosophy dissertation. Argument from Fairness o One of the more common arguments: This is unquestionable unfair.

It is not clear how its use would be unfair. Does the long-distance runner who consumes a meal heavy in complex carbohydrates the night before a run gain an unfair advantage over one who does not? Does a swimmer in the new Speedo suit have an unfair advantage over his competition if they decide to wear a different suit?

On this page

Argument from Coercion o The idea here is most athletes feel competitive pressure to make use of these substances or technologies that they would not otherwise choose to use. Yet, they are compelled to do so if most of their competitors are doing so.

This forces the athletes to do something they would rather not do and to do something that possibly puts them at some considerable risk. They need the degree to get a job. If they could get the same job without the degree, they would prefer not to go to college.

The adult professional might be able to weight the long-term risks of using steroids versus the potential gain. A fourteen year old trying to make the high school football probably cannot make that assessment in an objective and rational way.

Moreover, the dangers of using many of these drugs are often more severe for a growing youth than an adult. So the argument goes, in order to prevent the use of performance-enhancing drugs in children, we need to ban its use by adults.

The hours and intensity of training an elite athlete engages in is not likely to be healthy for a teenager. And yet many young, aspiring athletes do follow the lead of adult athletes on diet and training, quite possibly to detrimental effect.

Nonetheless, a sport might have a significant interest in making itself a good role model for youngsters and this might be one way to do this.Jun 01,  · The existence of the death penalty in any society raises one underlying question: have we established our justice systems out of a desire for rehabilitation, or out of a desire for retribution?

The lister has set out to examine both sides of the debate over the ethics and legality of capital. Ad Hominem (Argument To The Man): attacking the person instead of attacking his argument.

Arguments for and against the practice

For example, "Von Daniken's books about ancient astronauts . I once read in a book about food sensitivities that a way to test yourself was to consume half a liter upon waking up and not consume anything else (liquid or solid) for up to three hours and pay close attention to yourself (gurgling sounds in the stomach eg can already indicate intolerance) in that time.

Arguments about the prohibition of drugs, and over drug policy reform, are subjects of considerable controversy. The following is a presentation of major drug policy arguments, including those for drug law enforcement on one side of the debate, and arguments for drug law reform on the other.

Ad Hominem (Argument To The Man): attacking the person instead of attacking his argument. For example, "Von Daniken's books about ancient astronauts . Jul 31,  · A breakdown of the arguments given in favour of abolishing (or against reintroducing) the death penalty.

Bullfighting: arguments against and action against